Grace of Monaco depicts an interesting phase in the life of Hollywood actress Grace Kelly (Nicole Kidman). The year is 1962, and Princess Grace of Monaco after six years of marriage with Prince Rainier III (Tim Roth) feels lonely in a foreign land, namely, the principality of Monaco. Her husband is occupied with politics, mainly dealing with France’s president Charles de Gaulle (André Penvern), who wants him to levy taxes on the people of Monaco, and send the same to France. If Prince Rainier III doesn’t abide by this then Charles de Gaulle will invade Monaco.
With political pressure high, can the Princess Grace of Monaco go ahead with the film project that Alfred Hitchcock (Roger Ashton-Griffiths) has given her? It is a terrible time for the princess. Can she leave her desire to act, and connect with the people of Monaco? What role will she play in the ongoing tension between France and Monaco? These questions are answered as you watch the film Grace of Monaco.
The historical accuracy of the film is a talking point, however, the makers of the film never say that it is a true story, only that it is inspired by real events. If you are willing to overlook the authenticity of the events depicted in the film, Grace of Monaco is highly watchable. Nicole Kidman, who portrays Grace Kelly in the film, has done full justice to her role. She ably represents the dilemma that the princess faces of whether to accept Alfred Hitchcock’s proposal to work in Marnie or not?
As for the rest of the cast, it can be said that all of them have given fine performances. Director Olivier Dahan seems to have got the best out of his actors. The speech given by the Princess Grace of Monaco at the Red Cross ball towards the end of the film is moving. Also, the shots of Monaco throughout the film are eye-catching. If you like biographical films then Grace of Monaco might interest you. Even though this isn’t one of the finest biographical films, it is not a bad one-time watch.
What do you think?